Home
Application
Zulu Services
Store

                                          HIP HOP MUSIC & NEWS

 CHECK OUT KRS ONE INTERVIEW ON TRUE SCHOOL RADIO

 INTERVIEW STARTS AT PART 3
 http://www.archive.org/details/TrueSchoolRadio052207pt2

 
http://www.archive.org/details/TrueSchoolRadio052207pt3

 
http://www.archive.org/details/TrueSchoolRadio052207pt4

 
http://www.archive.org/details/TrueSchoolRadio052207pt5

 

 

 

Watch out. Now that the processed haired nasty man has flexed against another paper tiger and the IMUSHARPTON beast is still simmering if you listen to the chatter you will hear two things loudly as background noise.

Censorship and Hip Hop. Those things cannot co-exist.

Even before I was born censorship had a chilling effect on art. In the 30's and 40's Hollywood was hit with censorship and had to meet a code to get a movie released. It resulted in the stifling of creativity.

Then they went after comic books and that watered down really scary, creative output.

Then down South the religious right lashed out at Rock and Roll it just made Rock and Roll more popular. Calvin Butts, C. Delores Tucker are just a couple of folks that have made moves against Rap artists to no avail.

 But if you scan thru the talk shows all of the talking heads (Black and White) are all saying Imus was influenced by Rap Music and now once again Rap Music is a big Black Boogieman.

Missing in the dialogue (and seemingly in the recent documentary "Beyond Hip Hop by Byron Hurt" also full of talking heads) is the colonization factor in Rap Music.

Yes, the artists that promote garbage, hate, and all of the poison they spout are guilty of having no class, self hate, lack of respect for women, life and their people but it is the CORPORATE RECORD COMPANY EXECUTIVES AND THEIR CORPORATE DISTRIBUTORS AND VIDEO OUTLETS all run by Black Women that trade, profit and merchandise from this climate of hate.

 It is also these same corporate moguls that block any attempt by conscious artists to get signed, widely exposed or get media attention or love by the magazines.

We, the Zulu Nation and Federation and Turn Off Channel Zero amongst many other grass root organizations with the help of a few non-cowards in the media like Bro. Davey D ( www.daveyd.com ) and Rosa Clemente (WBAI) are pushing and supporting a nationwide Balance Campaign to not censor anyone, but rather to push to allow access to Mos Def, dead prez, Marvin Gaye, Sly Stone, James Brown, Gil Scott Heron, George Clinton, Prince, Chaka Khan and Aretha Franklin and not just have the radio waves blocked, gagged and over exposed with non-talent, payola bought, corporate drivel that plays the same 20 songs and videos 24 hours a day, seven days a week on all music media outlets.  Stay tuned and watch the fallout and see who get burned and how once again the  invisible colonizers who sit in the smoke filled rooms and make decisions that affect our lives, economics and art forms remain hidden and safe from public scrutiny.

Peace, Bro. Ernie

 

ALL KNEE-GROW RADIO STATIONS SHOULD BE ON ALERT
"The times they are a changin..."

And I couldn't be more pleased.
It's about time someone started to call Kathy Hughes on the carpet for her many years of irresponsible behavior in supporting the destruction of Black youth & culture.

Now we have the rap community itself starting to beat drums about Kathy Hughes.
Take a look at this article written by Cleveland based rapper "JAHI".
Not only is he critical of Kathy Hughes programming & policies, he even mentions CONYA DOSS as one of the alternatives that Kathy Hughes should be programming!
And I couldn't be more pleased.

Two years ago, Soul-Patrol.com was criticized in some quarters for telling the truth about Kathy Hughes current day role in the destruction of Black youth & culture:
(
http://www.soul-patrol.com/newsletter/2004/news20/)

...And we said much the same thing that "JAHI" is saying now.
However, it's not too late for Kathy Hughes.
At that time we offered to assist her in helping to facilitate a change.
We even offered to help her to secure advertisers for a different and more responsible radio format.
That offer remains open and I am sure that others would be willing to help her to "repent for her sins" as well.

ALL KNEE-GROW RADIO STATIONS SHOULD BE ON ALERT
"The times they are a changin..."


Now folks are starting to figure out that Kathy Hughes needs to be held accountable for her actions.
Will her advertisers make her pay for her crimes against the Black community, just like they made Imus pay?
Maybe it won't come down to that?
Perhaps she will see that she's got to be a part of the solution as opposed to being part of the problem?

Oh one more thing...

Q: Who does Al Sharpton work for???
A: Kathy Hughes

(CAN SOMEONE HERE PLEASE "CALL THE KETTLE BLACK")

This topic is DEFIANTLY on the agenda for the Radio Panel at the 2007 Soul-Patrol Convention in Philadelphia!!!

ALL KNEE-GROW RADIO STATIONS SHOULD BE ON ALERT
"The times they are a changin..."


Anyhow, read JAHI's article, he says it all much better than I could!
 

Turning Up the Heat on the conversation about Hip Hop
RADIO ONE AND SPRING FEST


by
JAHI

So I pick up the latest issue of Rolling Out Magazine. Big up to black indie press. I go to a page where it says, Spring Fest Miami 2007, hosted by AG Entertainment and Radio One. These are the acts performing live according to the listing:
 
  • YOUNG JOC
     
  • Boy N DA Hood
     
  • RIC ROSS
     
  • YING YANG TWINS
     
  • TRICK DADDY
     
  • D4L
     
  • CRIME MOB
     
  • DJ UNK
     
  • JIM JONES
     
  • MIKE JONES
     
  • LIL SCRAPPY
     
  • LLOYD
     
  • RICH BOY
     
  • JIBBS
     
  • RASHEEDA
     
  • CANTON JONES
     
  • MIMS
     
  • YOUNG BUCK AND G UNIT
     
  • BLAK JAK
     
  • T PAIN
     
  • SLIM THUG
    AND MORE TO BE ANNOUNCED

    With all this talking closed doors, in public, on the radio, internet, and news about what's right or what's wrong with Hip Hop and the messages that are being said against women, gun violence, drugs etc. RADIO ONE, owned by a black woman, Kathy Hughes, co signs for this type of concert where many if not most of these artist are talking about the very things "so-called" people want to be changed in Hip Hop.

    I say "so-called" because there has been a different landscape of Hip Hop out there all along. It's just been ignored. I know many in my circle that are Hip Hop artists, but also working in communities with youth, creating and establishing business and teaching in a fun, creative, and Hip Hop kind of way..But most importantly for this conversation, making good music.

    Radio One can't be given a pass on this conversation, because all of the music that's being talked about is being played RIGHT NOW on Radio One airwaves. As an artist that currently has a song being played on Radio One (Cleveland z107.9fm Artist: BELLA feat. JAHI Song: Cleveland Bred) I'm happy about that, especially because our company is an indie, and we didn't have a major budget to "make it rain" in any DJ's pockets. The song is a tribute to Cleveland, and it has no mention of guns, sex, disrespect or anything like that. So I can say Radio One is doing something for a more conscious style of artist, at least at my case and only for a short moment.

    But the larger question is, when will Radio One be held accountable for the music they are feeding to our kids, matter of fact, all of us. I'm down for freedom of speech, but why do we have to have our children hear from R Kelly, for example, at 3pm in the afternoon talking about he's a flirt? When where they be radio hosts that can cover more than bling and beef, and step it up to community awareness and global warming. We as Hip Hop artist live lives outside the club and the studio. We are real people.

    The deeper point is, in the mist of all this hoopla thanks to Mr. Imus, and now Hip Hop questioning itself and it's direction, Radio One, next weekend will put on a huge concert in Miami, supporting the very issues that are hurting Hip Hop, and the urban community worldwide. Look at the artist list again and I can tell you, without saying names or songs, exactly what's going to be happening next week.

    TOPICS IN THE SONGS WILL INCLUDE MOSTLY Selling drugs, primarily cocaine "Push it to the Limit," disrespect of black women by seeing them as sex objects, only wearing less than nothing and not promoting their intelligence or womanhood, asking or aggressively pursuing sex before knowing a person, shooting and killing, purposely saying negative words and phrases that promote's death, violence, or the worse of ourselves. Now if you don't believe me, check out the list again and listen to their music. Oh I forgot excessive alcohol consumption, over materialism, diamonds (most full of conflict), excessive consumerism to the 100th degree, with a side of beef. "From the window to the wall."

    So I firmly feel the pressure needs to spread to the radio, and Radio One in particular, because it is owned again by Kathy Hughes. What is her stance on what Imus said? Why, the date after the controversy broke, I heard an artist say "beautiful hoe's" on the radio( RADIO ONE). Yeah they bleeped out "hoes" but was all know what it said. What does Radio One and Kathy Hughes have to say about that?

    To the cultural and social political audience, it's more than saying we need more local artist being played. We need to NOT be afraid to say that we want to hear more conscious music. More music with a message. Also, don't forget to make sure that artists like myself, who have for 10+ years maintained a conscious tone to my music get thru because like Paris just mentioned in his article, as soon as the money flows to more conscious or "positive music," watch how many people hang up their gangsta swag and start wanting to be all positive and clean. Message to the people, don't fall for it. There are thousands of artists in Hip Hop that won't have to change their image, their style, or the content of their lyrics, and yeah that's me included. We've been doing good music all along.
    Back to the Spring Fest 2007.

    If we really want to do something, I'd like to see how many Rev. Sharpton's, Russell Simmons, Paris', Chuck D's, Davey D's, Kevin Powell's, Dead Prez, X-Clan's, Oprahs, Bill Cosby's, Harry Belefonte's etc. will commit to go to Miami and shut things down. Or better yet put on a bigger concert. I'll get to that in a minute. How many will challenge Kathy Hughes to change up the format. Or will we just give more lip service and no change. The time is now. I challenge Kathy Hughes and Radio One to do another concert and have a different line up. I challenge Radio One to play more emerging artists who have something more to talk about than the normal things being programmed into our minds. As an artist, hell yeah I'm throwing my name into the conversation. Why, because I have something to say. But I'm not the only one. There's 21 people on the Spring Fest bill. So the question may come, who would I put in their place, here's my top 21. How about you check out their music, their messages, and what they are bringing to the table of Hip Hop and see if it's a better representation of what Hip Hop is and can continue to be. Here's my list, excluding my self so you can't call me an opportunist.

    1. Public Enemy
    2. Erykah Badu
    3. The Roots
    4. Alicia Keys
    5. The Marley Family
    6. Tiye Phoenix
    7. X-Clan
    8. Jean Grae
    9. Blackalicious
    10. Algebra
    11. Femi Kuti
    12. Choklate
    13. Zion I
    14. Traycee Lynn
    15. Pharoah Monche
    16. Conya Doss
    17. Deep Rooted
    18. Medusa
    19. Outkast
    20. Bella
    21. The Coup
    Oh and I got many..many more.

    And if Radio One won't do it, who will.

    Respectfully,

    JAHI
    www.myspace.com/soulhop
  •  

     

    Everything must be seen from the perspective of history which is best qualified to teach us.
    Public Enemy whose lyrics were dense and laced with slang, street code and double meanings included this seemingly obscure passage
    "Told the Rab get off the rag
    Crucifixion ain't no fiction
    and now they got me like Jesus"
    These three lines were interpreted to be Anti-Semitic and were published and blasted around the world to proclaim that those who claimed to be Pro-Black were in reality anti-Semitic.
    Michael Jackson used the term "Jew me, screw me" on one of his songs, that and his professed desire to become a member of the Nation of Islam forced him to remove those lyrics from his albums and I believe led to a climate that his personal live was scrutinized and led to criminal charges and the undoing of his career.
    Buju Banton, Beenie Man and many other Rasta influenced Reggae artists were banned from performing live, their albums kept from radio play and even some had their contracts and careers ended because the included lyrics that were deemed anti-gay or even called "Hate Speech". 
    Prof. Griff, Ice T, even Marlon Brando felt  extreme heat for uttering what was deemed as anti-Semitic, or anti police or anti gay remarks.
    Fast forward to I believe 2003, Mos Def releases a scathing attack on the corporate despots and criminals that run the record industry and includes the phrase "Some Tall Israeli is running this rap shit, cocaine and Ecstasy is running this rap shit, quasi homosexuals are running this rap shit (quoted from memory, may not be exact). Leor Cohen (Russell's partner in Def Jam etc) feels the lyrics are cutting too close to home and all future records must have the T.I. reference removed.
    Rappers can shout nigga, nigga, nigger, niggaz, niggers until their jaws lock up, bitch, hoe or whatever the minute they step on Jewish or gay toes they are called onto the carpet and
    even have their careers ended. Is there a "Lyrics Censorship" board you bet you sweet ass there is.
    Stay tuned to see how the Imusharpton charade impacts Rap lyrics. Just remember what Bro. Shep said recently, Rap is not Hip Hip is not rap. Rap is part of Hip Hop. and as KRS1 teaches, Rap is something you do, Hip Hop is something you live.
    Peace, Bro. Ernie


    Check out my websites:
    www.rapphotos.com
    www.whoshotya1.com
    http://www.myspace.com/brotherernie

    "Those willing to sacrifice Freedom for Safety deserve neither"

    http:
    www.myspace.com/paniccioli

    http://www.myspace.com/erniepaniccioli

     

    Gangsta Moves Made by the Industry Designed to Shut You Down
     
    by Davey D
     
    Over the past couple of days two major rulings came out about the music industry in profound ways that will have long lasting NEGATIVE impact if we sit back and do nothing. One had to do with the FCC Ruling around the issue of payola.

    For those who don't know, the FCC cut a settlement deal with 4 radio chains including Clear Channel, CBS, Citadel and Entercom where they would be required to play one half hour worth of independent music per day. That means 6 songs by artists on independent record labels. Now a lot of people have been talking about it and jumping for joy, because they feel the airwaves have finally opened up and they now have a shot. Right? WRONG!!! This has got to be one of the most short sighted, full of crap rulings I've seen in a while. Here's a few things to keep in mind.

     
  • A while back former major label executives formed their own "Independent Label and Music group. This means that artists like Lil Jon and the Ying Yang Twins on TVT Records, Jim Jones on Koch/Dipset records, Mike Jones on Asylum records and Ice Cube on Lench Mobb Records can all be considered independent artists. If you think you're gonna hear a Peanut Butter Wolf cut, a new Hiero track or a new C-Bo cut think again. In all likelihood you will probably hear some of these major label connected indy artists and at most one or two cuts from an artists on Stonesthrow, RhymeSayers or Angeles records. In the words of Public Enemy... Don't Believe the Hype.

     
  • These radio companies agreed to donate 4000 hours of air time to indy artists. That DOES NOT mean 4000 hours per station. It means all the stations will add up their numbers and split that 4000 hrs. So you can get a company like Clear Channel that has 1500 stations. Add that to CBS 144 stations. Add that to stations owned Entercom and Citadel and divide that into the 4000 hours. All of sudden you have a commitment that can be short lived.

     
  • Hip Hop artists aren't the only ones seeking air play. Remember we have rock, country, reggae and R&B artists all vying for that coveted half hour per day slot. So that means your favorite Hip Hop and R&B station may opt to play 6 neo-soul cuts late at night when they slow things down and call it a wrap. Maybe they'll venture out and play a few reggae cuts. Remember a radio station is out to get high ratings and in doing so they will program themselves accordingly. Most are trying to win over female listeners. Hence, if they have choice between playing an independent artist like Goapele over a new hardcore joint by LA artist Mitchy Slick, who do you think these stations are gonna pick?

     
  • A radio station may decide that it wants to play indie records from another region as opposed to one that is local. So you could live in New York and instead of hearing Papoose or Saigon you may hear a bunch of southern records that are considered independent. Bay Area folks instead of hearing some new joints from Messy Marv, Zion I or San Quinn, may suddenly hear music from NY that falls under this independent label category. People in Seattle instead of hearing local artists like Chokalat, Blue Scholars, Dred I or Silent Lambs may instead hear LA artists like Ice Cube or Tha Dogg Pound who are on independent labels.

     
  • The decree doesn't stipulate that a station has to play 'New" music. Hence you might hear a Too Short or EPMD record from 15 years ago when they were on small independent labels. They may hear some old Snoop Dogg and 2Pac from Death Row which is considered independent. Heck if they want to they could go pull an old Sugar Hill Gang record like 'Rappers Delight' which was on an independent label. While hearing the classic can be good, it doesn't do any good for artists trying to break new records.

     
  • These radio stations are not doing you any favors by playing local or independent artists. Its what they SHOULD be doing. They were granted a license to broadcast on the public airwaves with the stipulation that they serve the public good. Hence there is no reason that Chicago artists should not be getting airplay in Chi-Town. There's no reason why Bay Area artists shouldn't be getting love from their local stations. Its a damn shame that it took a FCC ruling where they avoided harsher penalties for committing a crime (payola) that lead to them doing what they should've already been doing. Its akin to a dead beat dad getting hauled off to court and facing jail time suddenly holding a press conference to announce that he's gonna take care of his kids and pay child support.


  • Many are saying 'Fuck the Radio!'. 'Who needs them?' 'Hip Hop doesn't need to be on there anyway, we gotta take it back to the streets'. Well I agree. That's absolutely true...But here's the deal. Popular methods used to get around radio like Mixtapes and Internet Radio are under serious attack. Mixtape retailers and producers are getting arrested or fined.

    Even worse on the same day as the FCC rulings, major record labels cut a sinister deal with the Congress and US Copyright Office to basically shut down Online Radio unless you are very very rich. I don't wanna bog people down with too much reading so check out SaveInternetradio.com for all the gory details.

    For those who feel that they'll go out and just do shows keep in mind that even the venues are on lock. First in many cities, the main concert venues are owned by Clear Channel.

    Second, three years ago Clear Channel got a patent for the methodology used to record live performances, and sell it back to customers that same night at the venue. It's called Instant Live Performance Recordings. Well now you need a license from Clear Channel to do that in ANY venue. These cats went and got a patent for that and locked that income source up for themselves. A number of companies tried to sue them over this Draconian measure, but were unsuccessful. You can check out these two articles if you don't believe me:

     
  • EFF challenges Clear Channel Recording Patent

    All in all this FCC ruling was feel good measure designed to get everyone excited to the point that they start paying closer attention to these radio stations. In the beginning you are likely to hear a lot of fanfare about them reaching out to give the little guy a shot.. But after a short period of time when the lights and cameras go away they'll be catering to those who don't need any extra help.

    Please folks don't get hoodwinked.

    Davey D


    Below is a petition for you to sign to Save Internet Radio Please pass this far and wide..

     
  • http://www.petitiononline.com/SIR2007r/petition.html

    To:Internet Radio Listeners
    To my Congressional representatives, and to Congress as a whole,

    As a fan of Internet radio, I was alarmed to learn that music royalty rates were recently determined by the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) which, if enacted, would certainly silence most or all of my favorite online listening services. For most webcasters, this royalty rate represents more than 100% of their total revenues!

    The shuttering of the webcasting industry would be a loss for not only independent business owners, but also for musical artists, for copyright owners, and for listeners like me who enjoy the wide variety of choices available via Internet radio.

    I respectfully request that Congress look into this matter and initiate action to prevent it. As the CRB rate decision is retroactive to January 1, 2006, please understand that time is of the essence -- as the immediate impact of this decision could silence many free Internet radio stations forever.

    Sincerely,

    The Undersigned
     
  •  

    A must read article:
    Please bookmark the http://fairness4hiphop.blogspot.com
     
    Thug Life, Right-Wing News & the Iraq War: How Big Media Manufactures Consent
     
    http://fairness4hiphop.blogspot.com/2007/04/thug-life-right-wing-news-and-iraq-war.html
     
    On his 2000 Black On Both Sides, emcee Mos Def declared that “You know what's gonna happen with Hip Hop? Whatever's happening with us. If we smoked out, Hip Hop is gonna be smoked out. If we doin alright, Hip Hop is gonna be doin alright…Hip Hop is goin where we goin.”

    Profound words. And for a long time I repeated them when I was often asked what I thought could be done about the state of Hip Hop. I would say if people want Hip Hop to change they had to demand better music. People had to support artists who put out better music, and not purchase albums of artists they found detrimental to Hip Hop overall. Change in the art would come, when a change in demand was made.

    However, by his second album The New Danger in 2004, Mos Def’s tone had changed. Gone were the mantras that Hip Hop’s rebirth was going to be pushed along merely by a moral uplift in the people. Instead, the forces arrayed against the art form’s future are more sinister—“ Old white men is runnin’ this rap sh*t! Corporate forces runnin’ this rap sh*t!”

    Some scoff when it is put forward that much of the derogatory rap lyrics and video they see today is pushed by the industry. They label it a conspiracy theory and assert that artists who make a lot of money are hardly victims, but should instead take personal responsibility. I once thought along these lines. What I didn’t understand, what I could not connect, was that the same forces that limit Hip Hop to one dimensional themes of sex and violence are the very ones that threaten media overall. It is no conspiracy, but the way an institutionalized system that works for corporate profit rather than the public good operates. It is what happens when you stifle diversity and instead pander to expectations. And until this is understood, acknowledged and challenged, changing the face of Hip Hop will remain beyond our grasp. But rap music is not alone. A more popular form of expression has found itself stifled by the same dynamics—journalism. I offer the following analogy in three parts.

    The Rise & Fall of the Fairness Doctrine

    In 1949, the FCC adopted what came to be known as the Fairness Doctrine, a policy that designated station licensees as "public trustees," responsible for addressing controversial and contrasting issues of public importance. The key requirement of the Fairness Doctrine was that stations allowed opportunity for discussion of differing points of view, for the necessity of furthering the public good. For instance, if a radio station wanted to present conservative commentary, the Fairness Doctrine required they give equal and fair time to progressive/liberal commentary. Political candidates could demand equal time from radio and television. The Fairness Doctrine also worked as one of the checks against big media consolidation, recognizing that the airwaves belong to the people, not to corporate interests. This placed the Fairness Doctrine at continual odds with media broadcasters who sought to do away with government regulation, so that they would be beholden only to profit and not the public. As the saying goes, business is in the business of making money.

    In the 1980s came the Reagan Revolution, and a major push for deregulation that would take the government out of the way of the broadcasters. Reagan’s FCC chair, Mark S. Fowler, was one such advocate. A former broadcast industry lawyer, Fowler had long made public his belief that broadcasters had no special responsibilities to democratic discourse or the public good. Instead, Fowler believed broadcasters should be concerned with the bottom line. “The perception of broadcasters as community trustees should be replaced by a view of broadcasters as marketplace participants,” he would state. By placing a broadcast industry lawyer in charge of the FCC, it was not long before courts found that the Fairness Doctrine did not need to be enforced. In a hurried attempt to save what some defined as “a struggle for nothing less than possession of the First Amendment: Who gets to have and express opinions in America,” the Congress passed a bill to make the Fairness Doctrine into law. However, President Reagan vetoed the legislation. A similar veto threat doomed another attempt under George H.W. Bush in 1991.

    How a Shift in the Media Helped Shift Public Opinion

    The results of the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine were stunning. Already not enforced since the mid 1980s by an FCC in the pocket of big media, with the doctrine out of the way broadcasters found themselves free to do with the airwaves much as they pleased. By the 1990s a series of laws allowing for media consolidation placed much of what we hear or see into the hands of fewer owners. Alongside all of this was the rise of right-wing conservative radio. As Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, noted:
      The rise of conservative talk radio is directly linked to the absence of the Fairness Doctrine. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the myriad of shrill right-wing talk jocks are immune from having to provide even a modicum of balanced perspective. Media consolidation has greatly fueled the problem, creating powerful station chains with a distinct political perspective, such as Clear Channel and Sinclair Broadcasting. While on cable and satellite networks, Rupert Murdoch's FOX News Channel offers conservative commentary thinly disguised as journalism.
    The power of this limited media cannot be overstated. By shutting out nearly all forms of liberal radio, the public airwaves become dominated by right-wing commentary that enabled the monumental Republican Revolution of 1994 which culminated in the 2000 election of George W. Bush. Furthermore, channels like FOX News began to alter the very landscape of journalism. As noted by Robert Greenwald’s documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism <http://www.outfoxed.org/>, by pushing sensationalist headlines, featuring mostly pro-conservative commentators, race-bating, creating scapegoats and fostering an atmosphere that reduced news to sex, gossip and one-dimensional opinions, FOX News slowly pushed competing broadcasters closer to its own style—favoring profits over journalism. Frightened by its success and envious of its ratings, other news media outlets became increasingly more conservative, more dedicated to gossip stories and less interested in hard-hitting investigative journalism. Instead of challenging or questioning power, they became increasingly subservient to it.

    After 9/11 this turn in the media became even more glaring. With FOX News and conservative radio leading the way, the manipulation of American fear and the appeal to jingoism became commonplace. Big news media became a willing tool of the White House, offering little in the way of journalistic criticism. During the lead up to the invasion of Iraq, the media practically “rolled over” for the Bush administration, becoming a mouth-piece in making the case for war. It was not that “alternative” voices didn't exist. On independent and underground news sources, everything from the charge of WMDs to the claims of a Saddam Hussein-Al-Qaeda link was challenged and even disproved. Tens and hundreds of thousands marched in the streets against impending war. Yet from FOX News to CNN to the NY Times, the face of mainstream media was either indifferent to these voices or decidedly pro-war. Anti-war journalism and activists were either marginalized or shut out altogether from the discussion. Not surprisingly, the majority of the American public—with limited diverse options in the way of information—turned pro-war, with some
    3 out of 4 supporting military action <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/23/opinion/polls/main545568.shtml> against Iraq. Those that were fed a diet of strict conservative media like FOX News were the most prone to believe, falsely, that Iraq and 9/11 were linked <http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Iraq/Media_10_02_03_Press.pdf>. It was only after Iraq turned disastrous, and the mainstream news media was opened up to more diverse opinions, that a shift in portrayal of the war took place. Consequently, another vast shift in American popular opinion began to take place, this time more to the center and left, resulting in plummeting poll numbers for the Bush White House, a change of control in Congress and a solid majority <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3046823&page=1> who not only think the war was a mistake, but now want it to end.

    How “Old White Men” Run This Rap Sh*t

    The experience of the news media under media consolidation bears similarities to Hip Hop’s current one-dimensional state. The rise of “thug” rap coincided neatly with the increase of control by major corporations. Pushing exploitative tales of the “ghetto,” and laced with sex and violence—that indulge heavily in racial stereotypes—media termed “gangsta” rap became commercially viable to corporations more concerned with the bottom line than with art. With such financial success, and racial expectations, this one-dimensional face of Hip Hop became marketed as mainstream. The continued consolidation of media slowly strangled any form of diversity. As Professor Akilah Folami noted in a March 2007 article:
      The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has strengthened corporate control of radio stations and has allowed for the commodification of Hip Hop music. Corporate control of radio has stifled social commentary and diversity present in “old-school” Rap and Hip Hop. Instead, corporate control has encouraged the proliferation of Gangsta Rap and the Gangsta Image, which has become the defacto voice of contemporary Hip Hop culture.
    As noted in a previous essay <http://fairness4hiphop.blogspot.com/2007/04/their-eyes-were-watching-smut-turning.html>, author Nick Chiles recounted the same dynamics behind the rise and dominance of black “street literature.” As “Street Lit” became pushed as mainstream black culture by the publishing industry, it steadily began to replace any other form of black literature. That there is a market for it should not be surprising. Sensationalist topics like sex and violence will sell books or music, as easily as it sells gossip stories about Anna Nicole Smith. Consumers further bought into the trend, as it became the most common black literature offered. A proliferation of books of this type took place as authors attempted to cash in on this trend, or were pushed in that direction. In ways similar to how publishers helped manufacture the demand of “Street Lit, and how corporations manufactured consent in the news media, the popularity of “thug” rap was manufactured by marketing a single type of music and limiting the space for differing genres.

    Today activists for diversity in journalism are increasingly pushing to limit further media consolidation and for some reintroduction of the Fairness Doctrine, so that news is made available in varied formats. In the wake of the Don Imus controversy, there is even
    fear <http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/16/fairness_doctrine/> in conservative and right-wing radio, television and print journalism, that a return to the Fairness Doctrine is on the horizon. In reality, the Democratic Congress is not poised to take up the issue, and there will have to be many more campaigns, rallies and more before it appears on their radar. Nevertheless, the momentum is there. A similar movement to end the one-dimensional depictions in Hip Hop is needed, where something akin to a Fairness Doctrine can be implemented on the corporate distributors and broadcasters of black entertainment media. Otherwise we will continue to have a music industry that merely manufactures consent and dictates the face of black culture.
     


    www.Playahata.com -Interesting Quote of the Day-"I am a snitch, If I see a crime, I’m telling instantly! -Russell Simmons to Anderson Cooper on CNN 4/25/07


    Visit the Playahatas at http://www.playahata.com
    Check out Playahata at myspace at http://www.myspace.com/playahatacom
    Visit the Playahata Gift Shop at http://www.cafepress.com/playahata
    Join the discussion at http://www.playahata.com/hataforum

     

     

     

     

    An Open Letter to Hip Hop About Some Real Important Shyt

    Dear Folks who say they Love Hip Hop

    I wish there was a way to make this issue of Net Neutrality more interesting. I wish there was a way to spice it up and make it compelling like some sort of beef within the rap industry. Maybe I should get Brad and Angelina to talk about it instead of their baby. Maybe Lindsay Lohan or Paris Hilton can utter a few words and force us to take more of an interest.

    I wish Cam'ron spent his vast money holding press conferences, dissing punk ass Congress for taking tainted money from Verizon, SBC, and Comcast instead of going after Jay-Z. I’m glad Jay-Z ignored Cam’ron, unfortunately he remained silent as the President of Def Jam on this important issue. We'll see what happens after Def Jam finds it difficult or too costly to send out their e-post cards alerting me and others of their latest releases

    I’m sorry Miss Jones on Hot 97 was so upset and enraged that she felt compelled to make headlines calling Mary J Blige a bitch for not shouting her out at last week’s Summer Jam. It’s too bad that she didn’t use her 3-4 hours a day of airtime in the nation’s largest city to call the greedy Congress people who accepted money from these corporations ‘Bitches’. There ain’t gonna be any shout outs if the Senate follows Congress in passing this bill. Maybe she'll step it up when her parent company Emmis finds that folks from all over the country can no longer easily access their archived interviews on their website.

    It's too bad that many of us found this issue 'too complicated' and 'too overwhelming' and hence directed our attention to Ludacris and Ice Cube's beef with Oprah. This is the feedback I got after stories ran on my website as well as AllHipHop.

    Shyt I'm sorry Oprah was too busy telling Ed Lover that she really does love Hip Hop and that she listens to 50 Cent and his violent ass all damn day instead of alerting her millions of viewers about the issue of Net Neutrality.

    I’m sorry that KRS-One and others used these Internet airways to tell us about the Hip Hop Nation they want to build, but didn’t issue a call to action to protect a main arm of our communication. Whether you’re a ‘Hip Hop or Rap’ Lover the elimination of Net Neutrality is gonna impact you..

    Here's what's happening folks. The house has gone passed the COPE bill and rejected proposals to insure Net Neutrality. Those who sided with the Comcast and Verizon are well aware that the ability of ordinary people to communicate to the masses is a problem because it’s been the only thing holding them accountable. For the last 5 years, the biggest stories about government corruption, corporate swindles, global warming and no weapons of Mass Destruction has come through Internet bloggers who were able to push an issue to the masses and force Fox, CNN and other News outlets to pay some sort of attention.

    Anyone who is an activist and championed causes ranging from Election fraud and Diebold Machines, police brutality Freeing Mumia, Global warming, Media Reform and Saving the South Central Farm in LA just to name a few this is will especially hit you hard, because the Internet and its ‘neutrality’ provisions have enabled many of us to counter biased mainstream media outlets get information out about particular causes all over the world.

    Yesterday that ability took one step closer to coming to an end. The mantra being sung on Capitol Hill is ‘Shut it down’, ‘Shut that shyt down and redirect traffic to a handful of places and media outlets that they can influence and control’.

    Like Ice Cube said 'Laugh Now and Cry Later', because many of us will soon be crying when we see the Internet gets parceled up and we start paying outrageous tolls for basic amenities. And speaking of which why didn't Ice Cube talk about this issue instead of not being invited on Oprah?

    Anyway your next steps should you choose is to call your Senator's office and tell them to stand up and protect your interests. Ignoring this, waiting for others to take on your responsibility or acting like the issue will simply go away will not change this.

    While many of you may shrug this off and think it doesn't apply to you, stop and think of all the activities you do on the daily that involve the Internet. Such activities range from using phone cards which use Internet connections-(Many of y'all didn't realize that) on down to peeping your favorite blog... Many of y'all like to surf and check out my site, AllHipHop, Sohh, HipHopGame etc.. Folks that shyt is about to change in a big, big ,big way.

    You're soon gonna be left with only being able to peep monthly issues of The Source and XXL, who neglected to address this issue. The Source bypassed this in their Media Watch column and Elliot Wilson from XXL obvious saw his shyt talking editorials as more important then keeping you informed. I guess I can understand, all these Hip Hop Internet websites were eating into business.

    All you artists who felt like you can easily get your music out there via Myspace and the other sites, that's about to change… Oh yeah lets not forget the punk ass RIAA who like to sue everybody. They stayed silent on this and in fact while all this is going on they have quietly lobbying Congress to change laws so that they can fundamentally change the copyright laws in such a way that it will make it damn near impossible to pass things around via the net. Please read about this here:
     
    http://p076.ezboard.com/fpoliticalpalacefrm70.showMessage?topicID=453.topic

    Also let’s not let Steve Jobs and his vast i-tunes network off the hook. Perhaps I missed it, but I didn’t see him alerting us when you went to download your favorite song or stepped into his stores. Perhaps he figures he’s rich enough to pay for the inevitable increases while the rest of us can’t. In other words controlling 90% of the market is not enough.

    Shame on former Black Panther, Congressman Bobby Rush for selling us out and supporting these corporations. Shame on the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation and any other ‘Civil Rights’ group pretending to represent our interests while selling us out and taking the money to front for these groups. And while I’m glad former Congressman Ron Dellums did well in his Mayoral bid in Oakland, we should not forget that he’s also a lobbyist with one of his main clients being Verizon so shame on him as well. How’s Oakland gonna be a world class city that is a beacon for new technology and innovation when his client is one of the main people trying to shut down the Internet?

    In closing I'm gonna say this and it may be sobering for some... It's what my pops told me after I got caught fuccing up and then went home and tried to kiss up to him so I wouldn't get in trouble. He told me to stop acting like a wuss and start acting like a man. He told me it was time I grow up and accept responsibility. He then punished me for 3 weeks not for the fucc up, but for me trying to kiss his ass instead of owning up to my mistakes. This is about to happen to all of us...

    My point is this. Hip Hop is over 30 years old. We're not kids no more. This industry is not run by kids. To not involve ourselves in shaping the institutions that we rely on to get our information and music out is irresponsible. That’s some thing to pond about. Here's another breakdown on this issue courtesy of www.playahata.com

    Peace out for now
    Holla at your Senator before you holla back at me..
    Davey D


    House Rejects Net Neutrality

    The First Amendment of the Internet – the governing principle of net neutrality, which prevents telecommunications corporations from rigging the web so it is easier to visit sites that pay for preferential treatment – took a blow from the House of Representatives Thursday.

    Bowing to an intense lobbying campaign that spent tens of millions of dollars – and held out the promise of hefty campaign contributions for those members who did the bidding of interested firms – the House voted 321 to 101 for the disingenuously-named Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act (COPE). That bill, which does not include meaningful network-neutrality protections creates an opening that powerful telephone and cable companies hope to exploit by expanding their reach while doing away with requirements that they maintain a level playing field for access to Internet sites.

    "Special interest advocates from telephone and cable companies have flooded the Congress with misinformation delivered by an army of lobbyists to undermine decades-long federal practice of prohibiting network owners from discriminating against competitors to shut out competition. Unless the Senate steps in, (Thursday's) vote marks the beginning of the end of the Internet as an engine of new competition, entrepreneurship and innovation." says Jeannine Kenney, a senior policy analyst for Consumers Union.
    In case there was any question that Kenney's assessment was accurate, the House voted 269-152 against an amendment, offered by Massachusetts Democrat Ed Markey, which would have codified net neutrality regulations into federal law. The Markey amendment would have prevented broadband providers from rigging their services to create two-tier access to the Internet – with an "information superhighway" for sites that pay fees for preferential treatment and a dirt road for sites that cannot pay the toll.

    After explicitly rejecting the Markey amendment's language, which would have barred telephone and cable companies from taking steps "to block, impair, degrade, discriminate against, or interfere with the ability of any person to use a broadband connection to access…services over the Internet," the House quickly took up the COPE legislation.

    The bill drew overwhelming support from Republican members of the House, with the GOP caucus voting 215-8 in favor of it. But Democrats also favored the proposal, albeit by a narrower vote of 106 to 92. The House's sole independent member, Vermont's Bernie Sanders, a champion of internet freedom who is seeking his state's open Senate seat this fall, voted against the measure.

    Joining Sanders in voting against the legislation were most members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, including its co-chairs, California Representatives Barbara Lee and Lynn Woolsey, as well as genuine conservatives who have joined the fight to defend free speech and open discourse on the internet, including House Judiciary Committee chair James Sensenbrenner, R-Wisconsin, and Intelligence Committee chair Pete Hoekstra, R-Michigan.

    The left-meets-right voting in the House reflected the coalition that has formed to defend net neutrality, which includes such unlikely political bedfellows as the Christian Coalition of America, MoveOn.org, National Religious Broadcasters, the Service Employees International Union, the American Library Association, the American Association of Retired People, the American Civil Liberties Union and all of the nation's major consumer groups.

    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California, opposed COPE, while House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Illinois, and Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, were enthusiastically supported it.

    Among the Democrats who followed the lead of Hastert and Boehner – as opposed to that of Pelosi – were House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer and Maryland Representative Ben Cardin, who is running for that state's open Senate seat in a September Democratic-primary contest with former NAACP President Kweisi Mfume. Illinois Democrat Melissa Bean, who frequently splits with her party on issues of interest to corporate donors, voted with the Republican leadership, as did corporate-friendly "New Democrats" such as Alabama's Artur Davis, Washington's Adam Smith and Wisconsin's Ron Kind – all co-chairs of the Democratic Leadership Council-tied House New Democrat Coalition.

    The fight over net neutrality now moves to the Senate, where Maine Republican Olympia Snowe and North Dakota Democrat Byron Dorgan have introduced legislation to codify the net neutrality principles of equal and unfettered access to Internet content into federal law. Mark Cooper, the director of research for the Consumers Federation of America, thinks net neutrality will find more friends in the Senate, at least in part because the "Save the Internet" coalition that has grown to include more than 700 groups, 5,000 bloggers and 800,000 individuals is rapidly expanding.

    "This coalition will continue to grow, millions of Americans will add their voices, and Congress will not escape the roar of public opinion until Congress passes enforceable net neutrality," says Cooper.

    Cooper's correct to be more hopeful about the Senate than the House. But the House vote points up the need to get Democrats united on this issue. There's little question that a united Democratic caucus could combine with principled Republicans in the Senate to defend net neutrality. But if so-called "New Democrats" in the Senate side with the telephone and cable lobbies, the information superhighway will become a toll road.
     

     

     

    How Hip-Hop Lost The Plot

    From its origins as a uniting force, hip-hop has become debased as rappers have embraced violence and materialism, Jorge 'POP Master Fabel' Pabon will warn aficionados in a lecture tomorrow

     

    May the real hip-hop please rise! As we complete the third decade of what has been termed "hip-hop culture", much has yet to be explored regarding its roots, history, terminology and essence. Deciphering theories from facts is a gradual process since many resources are scattered, leaving missing links in the chains of history. Nevertheless, there are facts. These truths, unanimously agreed upon by the architects, legends and pioneers of the culture, should constitute the "hip-hop gospel", whereas the questionable theories should remain as footnotes until proven to be fact. Hip-hop culture continues to evolve as the most relevant renaissance of this time period. Those who recognise the original essence and spirit of the culture build on its strong foundation while others innocently or purposefully tear it apart.

    During the 1970s, New York City was the canvas for an extremely complex society of urban warriors with social and cultural imperatives. In this vibrant mosaic of cultures flourished a diverse population with varying traditions, characteristics and attitudes. The fast pace and aggressive nature of the city warranted the average urbanites development of survival instincts, finding ways to exist against all odds. Certain neighbourhoods were truly concrete jungles laced with countless obstacles and an array of predators. Conscientious elders made an effort to educate their communities by sharing their history, wisdom and knowledge of self. These sages illuminated paths towards success by providing a strong foundation for the youth to build upon.

    When "hip-hop" was just words in a rhyme, NYC's urban youth engaged in various forms of artistic self-expression. For the most part, these cultural components were recycled from previous creative movements. Music, speech, dance, art and fashion were among the elements either passed down by earlier generations or emulated by the next. Mentorship played a major role as skills were passed down to protégés. In certain cases, teachers referred to their students as sons/daughters. With this acquired knowledge came responsibility. The protégés were expected to carry on the reputation and expertise of the mentor since they were reflections of each other's dedication. Sons and daughters were also encouraged to respect their elders and take their skills to the next level in order to stay on top of the food chain. The most dedicated settled for nothing less than the best, representing to the fullest. We took great pride in our art, as it was an extension of our souls, marked our status and a source of self-empowerment. It was a means for achieving ghetto celebrity status. Getting there was half the battle; the other half was maintaining our rank in a highly competitive arena.

    At the epicentre of this great renaissance there were the jams. Block parties became our pow-wows. These cultural gatherings served as a place to exhibit our skills, engage in artistic warfare and network. For the most part it was a celebration of life through art. These all age events were free and accessible to the community. They provided an alternative to the negative activities that plagued our neighbourhoods. Although violence still threatened our communities, artistic expression became tools of war as we battled for king and queenship. These cultural imperatives were obtained by any means necessary. Plazas and schoolyards were occupied without permits. Electricity was jacked from the lamppost giving power to the DJ's equipment. Subway cars and handball courts became galleries for outlaw artists. The spirit of revolution echoed into the dawn of a new era, the epoch of hip-hop culture. Outdoor jams and community events provided a platform for the unification of various art forms. DJs, MCs, dancers, and writers became identified as components of a common movement eventually labelled hip-hop.

    The common pulse which gave life to all these elements is rhythm, clearly demonstrated by the beats the DJ selected, the dancers' movements, the MCs' rhyme patterns and the writer's name or message painted in a flowing, stylised fashion. The culture was identified in the early 1980s when DJ Afrika Bambaataa named the dynamic urban movement "hip-hop". The words "hip-hop" were originally used by MCs as part of a scat style of rhyming, for example: "Hip-hop ya'll and ya don't stop, rock on, till the break of dawn." At about the same time, certain slang words also became titles of the dance forms, such as "rockin'" and "breakin'", used generally, to describe actions with great intensity. Just as one could rock the mic (microphone) and rock the dance floor, one could rock a basketball game or rock some fly gear (dress impressively). The term "break" also had more than one use in the 1970s. It was often used as a response to an insult or reprimand, for example, "Why are you breakin' on me?" Break was also the section on a musical recording where the percussive rhythms were most aggressive and hard driving. The dancers anticipated and reacted to these breaks with their most impressive steps and moves.

    In order to report properly the history of dance forms associated with hip-hop, one must journey both inside and outside of New York City. Although dance forms associated with hip-hop did develop in New York City, half of them (ie, popping and locking) originated and developed on the west coast of the US as part of a different cultural movement. Much of the media coverage in the 1980s grouped these dance forms together with New York's native dance forms (B-boying/girling and uprocking ), labelling them all "breakdancing." As a result, the West Coast "funk" culture and movement were overlooked and underrated as the public ignorantly credited "hip-hop" as the father of the funk dance forms. This is just one example of misinformation that undermines the intricacies of each dance form.

    It is imperative that we acknowledge hip-hop culture as a transcending force which belongs to those who create it, live it, support it, protect it, and promote it, regardless of their race, religion, nation, tribe, crew or organisation. We might fly different colours, which represent our individuality and commitment to various parties or beliefs, but in truth, we all produce one collective mosaic.

    Although hip-hop culture was, for the most part, initially celebrated by African and Caribbean descendants in the 1970s, it was also embraced by various other ethnicities during this period, especially after it found its place above ground. For the true hip-hoppers, our standards have never changed regarding who is "down by law" and who isn't. One's skills for speak for themselves, regardless of one's skin tone or background. To us, it's about being original and bringing something new to the elements while preserving the foundation set by the pioneers.

    Hip-hop culture continues to unite people of various religions, nations, and cultures through the universal languages of dance, art, music, fashion and many other tools. The fact that hip-hop is not a religion, philosophy or belief system gives us a neutral platform to unite upon. It is inclusive and has always consisted of various influences.

    Peace can be achieved by respecting each other's differences, uniting in our commonalities, and agreeing to disagree with each other's opinions and views. Hip-hop culture has not only given us a vehicle of expression, but when used positively, it has given us an opportunity to explore the world and change the lives of many. It has helped many of us understand ourselves as well as others. It has helped to educate us and challenge our views. It has given many the opportunity to become self-empowered. It has given us many ways to communicate with our youth and has helped us to exercise and stimulate their senses. The outcome of these efforts often brings about a strong conscious generation of individuals who have found peaceful ways to settle differences and who stand for the upliftment of their community.

    Unfortunately, hip-hop culture has been misrepresented by the media and those who are either ignorant or have a hidden agenda. In this quest for peace, we shouldn't depend solely on the media for information about hip-hop culture, since there have been many cases where the media has helped to promote division and corruption within the culture. We should not rely on sources that have no authority, knowledge or understanding regarding hip-hop culture's origins and evolution. We should make it our business to research, cross-reference and fact check all of the pieces to this great puzzle. With this we can become students of the culture. Ultimately I have found that the most honourable teachers continue to be great students.

    The inspiration for developing a lecture entitled "The Great Hip-Hop Swindle" is an attempt to address the misrepresentation and exploitation of this culture by the industry, media, educational institutions and in some cases even its own practitioners. For the most part the media became the gatekeepers of information and dictate what is or isn't "hip-hop". Irresponsible journalists distort history by not fact checking information and have been known to fill in the blanks with conjecture. So-called "hip-hop" magazines and radio stations claim to be "the home of hip-hop" meanwhile they only represent one component of the culture, rap. Radio station's programmers tend to rotate the same half dozen artists all day long excluding a wide variety of flavours within the rap genre. Corporations invest in a culture they hardly understand with no regard to preserving its integrity and authenticity. Once the recording industry convinced MCs/rappers they could stand alone without a DJ, hip-hop dancers or the element of aerosol art, the culture was stripped apart. This along with the death of the jams, also known as block parties, was the beginning of the end of hip-hop in its original state. In short, the recording industry hijacked the term "hip-hop" and made it synonymous only with rap. Artistic and educational institutions offer "hip-hop" courses often taught by individuals who are not only unqualified but never lived a hip-hop day in their life. Many of these academics do not support the hip-hop communities and are seldom seen at events. As the blind lead the blind, younger generations have few reliable sources.

    Unaware of hip-hop's magnificent legacy, some of our youth use the rap element to perpetuate and glorify many of the social ills our hip-hop forefathers were trying to overcome. The majority of pioneers were using this culture progressively while today many of our youth have reversed the order by promoting destructive lifestyles via rap. This is precisely one of the reasons why "The Great Hip-Hop Swindle" lecture was conceived. In order to embrace the essence of the culture one must know its history and purpose. The lecture is accompanied by an audio/video presentation that helps illustrate many key points and provides evidence regarding the true identity of hip-hop culture. Potential solutions are suggested including some that have had positive results. "The Great Hip-Hop Swindle" takes us on a journey through the rise, fall and resurrection of this era's most influential movement.

    © Pabon 2006

    The Great Hip-Hop Swindle Lecture is part of Robert Hylton Urban Classicism at the Purcell Room, London SE1 (0870 380 0400) 12.30pm tomorrow. Fabel performs a short dance piece today

     

    http://www.newpittsburghcourier.com/index.php?article=15114


    New venue is major performance resource

    by Omar-Abdul R. Lawrence
    for New Pittsburgh Courier


    A new venue has opened its doors to the Pittsburgh cultural community.
    Located at 607 East Ohio St. on the North Side, The Unda'Ground Lounge is an intimate performance venue, hip-hop museum, and retail outlet, created, co-owned, and maintained by international hip-hop icon, Paradise Gray.

    As a native New Yorker and recent Wilkinsburg area transplant, Gray made hip-hop history managing the legendary Latin Quarter Club during throughout the 1980s. The Latin Quarter was the major breeding ground for an underground movement making its transition into international commerce. Artists such as Queen Latifah, De La Soul, Salt and Pepa and Eric B & Rakim got their big break into the industry performing at the Latin Quarter for a crowd laced with powerful execs and tastemakers of the day. Def Jam founder Russell Simmons and Def Jam's inaugural artist L.L. Cool J were also regulars at the Latin Quarter.

    Following his work with the Latin Quarter Gray co-founded the Rap group X Clan along with Robert Lumumba Carson, son of activist Sonny Carson. Gray became known as "Paradise The Arkitech" and Carson dubbed himself "Professor X."

    Though Professor X recently passed away, the legacy lives on of a group that used their industry connections and politically conscious music to help bring consciousness to African-American youth.

    From 2000-2003 Gray was the executive in charge of urban music at the infamous Internet music company MP3.COM, one of the last Silicon Valley companies to go public in the dot.com boom and the precursor to all the music downloading companies and controversy. Gray adds," I wasn't a founder but I was there pre-I.P.O. and went public with MP3.com as head of Black Music. We were millionaires until Universal sued us and bought us out for one tenth the value."

    Now a Wilkinsburg resident, Gray is bringing his in depth music industry expertise to Pittsburgh. Gray explains," I came to Pittsburgh in 1992 just after my group (X Clan) broke up. I didn't travel again for nine months and in that time Pittsburgh healed my soul. So, I wanna' give back to the people of Pittsburgh."

    Enter the Underground Lounge. Housed in the first floor retail space of a building Gray manages and maintains, he decided this year to remodel it himself and open a business there instead of renting it out. Gray co-owns the business along with a silent investor who owns the building and other local properties.

    The Unda'Ground lounge is not a bar and restaurant as one might expect from the lounge moniker. Instead New York's legendary Lyricist Lounge inspired it, and The Unda'Ground Lounge is positioning itself to be a platform for emerging talent the way the Lyricist Lounge gave the world its first glimpse at artists such as Notorious B.I.G. and Mos Def.

    "There are a lot of venues with the name lounge in Pittsburgh," explained Gray. "However, the Unda'Ground Lounge is inspired by the Lyricist Lounge. Our primary focus is release parties, open mikes, and retail."

    The Unda'Ground Lounge also showcases Gray's unparalleled hip-hop memorabilia collection of photos and flyers. Gray's collection was licensed for the VH1 hip-hop documentaries that have been aired over the last two years. Prints of some of his classic photos will be available in the retail area that greets you as you walk in with framed photos, t-shirts, CDs, art and books along the walls. The retail area is connected to the cozy performance area that with a stage, seating, microphones, and sound system.

    The Unda'Ground Lounge opens its doors Monday thru Saturday 11 am-7 pm. Fridays and Saturdays beginning at 9 p.m. Gray will host an open mike series with a